Home / Blog /

How Organizations Are Tackling CMMC 2.0 Compliance: Real-World Insights and Strategies

Cybersecurity

How Organizations Are Tackling CMMC 2.0 Compliance: Real-World Insights and Strategies

Jim Carlson
Jim Carlson

2025-03-10 · 7 min read

Blog content

Key Takeaways

  • Most organizations are using a blend of tools and strategies to work through CMMC 2.0 controls.
  • Homegrown spreadsheets remain popular but often lead to inefficiencies and missed requirements.
  • Professional guidance and purpose-built platforms offer the most consistent path to audit success.

Introduction

TLDR: Organizations navigating the complexities of CMMC 2.0 are using everything from manual spreadsheets to professional consulting services. While no single method stands out as a perfect solution, combining tools and investing in expertise can significantly improve outcomes.

Understanding how others approach CMMC 2.0 compliance is critical for defense contractors preparing for audits. A recent poll and discussion thread from the CMMC subreddit revealed diverse strategies and highlighted the real challenges teams face as they work through NIST 800-171 requirements. If you are responsible for compliance, this roundup of real-world experiences offers valuable lessons and key takeaways to refine your own approach.

To see how CMMC 2.0 fits into the broader regulatory landscape and what’s changed since CMMC 1.0, check out our in-depth look at Key Changes from Previous Regulations in CMMC 32 CFR Part 170. It breaks down the shift to independent verification, the new three‑level model, and the phased rollout that contractors need to know.

What the Poll Revealed: Common Tools and Tactics

Why do so many teams still rely on spreadsheets and manual processes?

According to the poll, the most common method among respondents was using a homegrown tracker or CMMC Center of Awesomeness (COA) spreadsheet, with 23 out of 66 participants choosing this approach. The appeal is clear: spreadsheets are accessible, flexible, and free. However, many users acknowledged the limitations. In-depth control implementation often requires referencing NIST documents directly, and spreadsheets rarely offer built-in validation or task management.

Beyond spreadsheets, many also reported:

  • Manually working through PDFs of NIST controls (12 votes)
  • Hiring a third party to manage the compliance process (13 votes)
  • Relying on expensive platforms (11 votes)
  • Using a combination of several methods

This last point came up frequently in the comments: most organizations are not picking one method but are blending multiple tools and strategies throughout their compliance journey.

Lessons from the Field: Community Insights and Challenges

What really moves the needle on CMMC readiness?

The comment section added color and depth to the poll results. One commenter shared a years-long journey from fumbling through early spreadsheets to ultimately passing a full C3PAO assessment with no findings. Their success hinged not on a single tool but a progressive combination of learning, adapting, and eventually working with experienced consultants.

Several common themes emerged:

  • No tool is perfect. Even polished GRC platforms require users to fully understand the underlying requirements.
  • Spreadsheets can get you started but often fall short. Users reported frustration with version control, lack of integration, and the inability to easily track progress across teams.
  • Education and expertise are irreplaceable. Training internal staff or working with CMMC Registered Practitioners (RPs) or C3PAOs consistently helped teams avoid critical missteps.
  • Custom GRC solutions have value when built well. Some organizations built their own portals using SharePoint, Power BI, and other tools. While flexible, these setups often lacked the depth of a dedicated compliance system.

If you’d like a direct comparison between CMMC and other leading frameworks, so you can understand where spreadsheets or GRC platforms might fall short, our post on Comparison of CMMC with Other Cybersecurity Frameworks offers side‑by‑side details on NIST SP 800‑171, SP 800‑172, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, and more.

The Consultant and Platform Advantage

Is it worth investing in professional help and compliance software?

Across the responses, one thing became clear: when budgets allow, consultants and purpose-built GRC platforms provide significant advantages.

Professionals familiar with CMMC and NIST 800 171 requirements can:

  • Tailor controls to your organization’s structure
  • Ensure documentation is audit-ready
  • Identify evidence gaps well before the assessment

As mentioned by multiple users, CMMC compliance platforms offer automation, task delegation, and centralized policy management. These tools don’t replace the need for internal understanding, but they accelerate implementation and simplify maintenance.

As one user aptly noted, CMMC is not a “one and done” framework. Even after achieving compliance, ongoing monitoring, evidence collection, and policy updates are required. That is where tools with reminders, workflow tracking, and responsibility assignments make a measurable difference.

If your team is working through the process, the CMMC dashboard is a streamlined option that helps manage controls, track tasks, and prepare for assessments. It integrates everything in one place, cutting down on manual work and making it easier to maintain audit readiness. Sign up to receive updates on the launch of our upcoming compliance platform.

To understand the full impact of rising assessment demand and supply‑chain pressures, our analysis on The Impact of CMMC on Defense Contracts & Supply Chain explains how booking delays, flow‑down requirements, and contract eligibility rules are shaping contractor behavior today.

Conclusion

The Reddit poll makes one thing clear: there is no single path to CMMC 2.0 compliance, and that is okay. The journey involves constant learning, resourcefulness, and, eventually, investment in the right tools or people.

Here is a quick recap:

  • Most organizations use a combination of spreadsheets, manual reviews, platforms, and consultants.
  • Homegrown tools are common but often require supplementation with expert guidance.
  • Purpose-built platforms and trained professionals dramatically improve the likelihood of passing an assessment.

If you are still relying solely on spreadsheets or PDFs, now is the time to explore options that scale with your needs. The CMMC dashboard offers a smarter way to manage controls, delegate tasks, and stay prepared for your audit, without the headaches of juggling disconnected tools.

Ready to streamline your CMMC compliance journey? Let the dashboard do the heavy lifting so your team can focus on execution. Sign up to receive updates on our upcoming compliance platform. We’ll help you and your team collaborate more efficiently and stay on track for every requirement.

Get Started

Reference: Reddit Post